Answer Fake Claims About Hadith.
I often hear
claim for An Non-Muslim Youtuber, Hadith
is not original and only tales that hear Islamic Scholars, severity, he claim
hadith is fiction and unvalid, I will counter this claim with historical facts
about hadith, is it true hadith is fiction?
First, I
seen often, Non-Muslim Youtuber who sayed
it, is hypocrite, he doesn’t believe hadith is valid, but,he use several hadith
for attack Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam s personality, If he doesn’t believe, is his option, but
hypocrite, attack Islamic religion with Islamic text , that he doesn’t believe,
if he doesn’t believe to hadith, why he attack
Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam personality with hadith?
Include take issue with Rasulullah
Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam die with several hadith, and make it
proof for sayed Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam is fake propeth. Is
a paradox.
The Youtuber
sayed, Islamic Scholars only write fiction story about Rasulullah Shallahu
Alaihi Wasallam for entertaiment, and the Youtuber sayed , Islamic Scholars
only heared tales from peoples, and
wrote it, from this, we know, he doesn’t
know a method for Islamic Scholars to
collect hadiths.
Islamic
Scholars has a special method for collect hadith, doesn’t only they hear and wrote hadiths, like Youtuber s claim,but they first checking hadith
sources,and searched a chain of sources,
and chain of sources must until to Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam s
shahaba, who heared it from Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam.
Condition to
be a source person for hadith, is not easy, the person who be a source for
hadith, must an pious, clever, and honest person, the condition is very strict,
one day, one of Islamic Scholar s , Imam Bukhari, went to search the chain of
sources of one hadith, he interviewed
three man, and two from three man are credibles, but Imam Bukhari left third
man because he hit his horse, according Imam Bukhari, he is uncredible because
hit his horse.
In hadith s
discipline, are discipline Rijal Al-Hadith for identified a person who be a hadith source person, source
person including shahaba, tabiin, and next generation, and also, are discipline
of Jarh Wa Tadil, for identified hadith s person source, he is good
person or bad person, is influential for decide hadith s credibility, is a hadith accepted or rejected.
Jarh Wa Tadil and Rijal Al-Hadith is discipline for decide source s
credibility, if thereby, is it possible all hadith is fake, temporary Islamic Scholars so thorough for decide sources? Is it
possible they only write what they heared from people?
Is true,
hadith collected 7 or 8 decade after Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam
die, does not mean not enough primary
source about hadith that wrote by
shahaba, many hadith note wrote by
shahaba, but it is not for public books, only for private notes, example notes from Abu
Hurairah, Musa Al-Asyari, Hamam Ibn Munabbih, and other, is mean, hadith is not
from secondary source only, but, many primary sources wrote about hadith, and writers are Rasulullah Shallahu Alaihi Wasallam s shahaba,
Hamam Ibn Munabbih is student from Abu Hurairah, one of Rasulullah Shallahu
Alaihi Wasallam shahaba.
Recommendation
book/ articles:
Ansary, Tamim: Dari Puncak Baghdad Sejarah Dunia Versi Islam, Penerbit
Serambi, 2017 M.
Tim Dosen
UINSA: Studi Hadits, UIN Sunan
Ampel Press, 2014 M.
Posts
Post a Comment